|
locked
Re: JTALERT and Last version of HRD logbook ( 6.7.0.301 )
Hi
the ADIF-HRD version includes all QSL info !
73
Hi
the ADIF-HRD version includes all QSL info !
73
|
By
Daniele
·
#31981
·
|
|
locked
Re: JTALERT and Last version of HRD logbook ( 6.7.0.301 )
Hi
It _may_ be what you have set for conformation - worked, LOTW, etc.
ADIF does not usually have the QSL info - HRD may have an extended export option that does include it - I would double check
Hi
It _may_ be what you have set for conformation - worked, LOTW, etc.
ADIF does not usually have the QSL info - HRD may have an extended export option that does include it - I would double check
|
By
Tom Melvin
·
#31979
·
|
|
locked
JT Alert Main Window
Any plans to allow the main window to be re-sized?
I would love to be able to essentially rotate the window 90 degrees – in other words, have tall columns. Instead of choices of 1-4 X 6-9, be
Any plans to allow the main window to be re-sized?
I would love to be able to essentially rotate the window 90 degrees – in other words, have tall columns. Instead of choices of 1-4 X 6-9, be
|
By
John K9EL
·
#31978
·
|
|
locked
Re: JTALERT and Last version of HRD logbook ( 6.7.0.301 )
Hi
probably I solved, creating a new DB in HRD from scratch and importo the ADIF exported before .
Now with last version of HRD and last version of JTALERT no more crash .
Only a thing seems to be
Hi
probably I solved, creating a new DB in HRD from scratch and importo the ADIF exported before .
Now with last version of HRD and last version of JTALERT no more crash .
Only a thing seems to be
|
By
Daniele
·
#31977
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
I'm having the same problem. Started a day or two ago, possibly after a Windows update.
I have multicast set up. After one or two QSOs, it looks like JTAlert stops responding. JTAlert 2.16.4 (also
I'm having the same problem. Started a day or two ago, possibly after a Windows update.
I have multicast set up. After one or two QSOs, it looks like JTAlert stops responding. JTAlert 2.16.4 (also
|
By
Bob WB2NVR
·
#31976
·
|
|
locked
Re: JTALERT and Last version of HRD logbook ( 6.7.0.301 )
Hi
first of all thank you for suggests .
I contacted also the HRD team support and they didn't know about problems in the last revision ( 6.7.0.301 ) .
What I saw is that when all tools are up, HRD,
Hi
first of all thank you for suggests .
I contacted also the HRD team support and they didn't know about problems in the last revision ( 6.7.0.301 ) .
What I saw is that when all tools are up, HRD,
|
By
Daniele
·
#31975
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
I'm seeing the same thing here on 2.3.0-rc1
FIrst start...JTAlert sees no packets at all...no band info or such in title bar
Second start...JTAlert sees band info...but no decodes
Third start...all is
I'm seeing the same thing here on 2.3.0-rc1
FIrst start...JTAlert sees no packets at all...no band info or such in title bar
Second start...JTAlert sees band info...but no decodes
Third start...all is
|
By
Michael Black
·
#31974
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
Here's my Help -> About JTAlert
JTAlert Instance : #1
JTAlert Start Params : /wsjtx
WSJT-X Window Title : WSJT-X - IC7300 v2.2.2 by K1JT, G4WJS, and K9AN
WSJT-X Command Line :
Here's my Help -> About JTAlert
JTAlert Instance : #1
JTAlert Start Params : /wsjtx
WSJT-X Window Title : WSJT-X - IC7300 v2.2.2 by K1JT, G4WJS, and K9AN
WSJT-X Command Line :
|
By
Greg, KM5GT
·
#31973
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
It looks like the broadcast is going out okay, but still the same result. "Unable to communicate with the WSJT-X process"
It looks like the broadcast is going out okay, but still the same result. "Unable to communicate with the WSJT-X process"
|
By
Greg, KM5GT
·
#31972
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
Try setting wsjtx to use a multicast address for the UDP Server address. I suggest 239.255.0.0
After making the change restart both wsjtx & JTAlert
de Laurie
Try setting wsjtx to use a multicast address for the UDP Server address. I suggest 239.255.0.0
After making the change restart both wsjtx & JTAlert
de Laurie
|
By
HamApps Support (VK3AMA)
·
#31971
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
What does the Help/About show? It shows all the JTAlert processes.
What antivirus are you running?
Mike W9MDB
What does the Help/About show? It shows all the JTAlert processes.
What antivirus are you running?
Mike W9MDB
|
By
Michael Black
·
#31970
·
|
|
locked
No Decodes - Packets Seen with Wireshark
I'm a bit puzzled. JTAlert stopped showing any decodes. I am getting the dreaded "Unable to communicate with the WSJT-X process" see below. I am running WSJT-X v2.2.2 0d9b96 with JTAlert version
I'm a bit puzzled. JTAlert stopped showing any decodes. I am getting the dreaded "Unable to communicate with the WSJT-X process" see below. I am running WSJT-X v2.2.2 0d9b96 with JTAlert version
|
By
Greg, KM5GT
·
#31969
·
|
|
locked
Re: JTALert #FT8 Falling behind and then not working at all.
#FT8
What version of WSJT-X?
What are your PC specs, cpu type, # cores, memory installed?
de Laurie VK3AMA
What version of WSJT-X?
What are your PC specs, cpu type, # cores, memory installed?
de Laurie VK3AMA
|
By
HamApps Support (VK3AMA)
·
#31968
·
|
|
locked
Re: Scan Log Missing
From the JTAlert window menu...
Within the Settings window...
de Laurie VK3AMA
From the JTAlert window menu...
Within the Settings window...
de Laurie VK3AMA
|
By
HamApps Support (VK3AMA)
·
#31967
·
|
|
locked
Re: Scan Log Missing
OK, I think I found it.
I went to Standard ADIF file and imported there. It does not appear to indicate that this is where one scans an existing log for new users, but I have it now.
73, John
OK, I think I found it.
I went to Standard ADIF file and imported there. It does not appear to indicate that this is where one scans an existing log for new users, but I have it now.
73, John
|
By
John K9EL
·
#31966
·
|
|
locked
JTALert #FT8 Falling behind and then not working at all.
#FT8
The program was working like a charm with WSJT-X. Then all of a sudden its starting to fall behind. Sometimes it doesn't show anything at all. I know its connected, because it reads the mode and band
The program was working like a charm with WSJT-X. Then all of a sudden its starting to fall behind. Sometimes it doesn't show anything at all. I know its connected, because it reads the mode and band
|
By
John K9JMS
·
#31965
·
|
|
locked
Re: Scan Log Missing
Thank you for the reply.
Excuse my ignorance - I was in that section, but I do not see anywhere to scan my existing ADIF log like the previous version.
73, John K9EL
Thank you for the reply.
Excuse my ignorance - I was in that section, but I do not see anywhere to scan my existing ADIF log like the previous version.
73, John K9EL
|
By
John K9EL
·
#31964
·
|
|
locked
Re: Scan Log Missing
From the release notes...
de Laurie VK3AMA
From the release notes...
de Laurie VK3AMA
|
By
HamApps Support (VK3AMA)
·
#31963
·
|
|
locked
Scan Log Missing
I downloaded the latest version, but the "scan log" setting is not there. Perhaps there is some other setting that must be enabled for the scan log option to appear?
Thanks John K9EL
I downloaded the latest version, but the "scan log" setting is not there. Perhaps there is some other setting that must be enabled for the scan log option to appear?
Thanks John K9EL
|
By
John K9EL
·
#31962
·
|
|
locked
Re: Can /MM (maritime mobile) be ignored for DXCC purposes?
I am running version 2.16.14.
It seems like the ADIF Export from DX4WIN includes the DXCC Prefix in
the output, even for /MM stations. I'll have to fix this and rebuild.
groups.io
I am running version 2.16.14.
It seems like the ADIF Export from DX4WIN includes the DXCC Prefix in
the output, even for /MM stations. I'll have to fix this and rebuild.
groups.io
|
By
Jim Reisert AD1C
·
#31961
·
|