Date   

locked Change Callsign

Doug Netherton VE3MCF
 

Sorry for the bandwidth, but how do you change the active callsign for JT-Alert?
I've uninstalled JT-Alert and deleted all associated files I could find, but after I reinstall 1.5.9, it still comes up as VX3MCF (A special prefix I used for December 2011).

I'm sure there is a probably something simple I've missed.
Thanks for help in advance.

Doug, VE3MCF


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Dave Wright <hfradiopro@...>
 

My two-cents worth here, I guess:

Some ops won't do LoTW just because they require you to send a copy of your license or prove you are who you say your are.  Others won't do eQSL because they DON'T have the security of LoTW.  All in all, it is two sides of the same coin.

Ultimately, the willingness to QSL is up to each individual op, as is the method they choose to QSL.  Some ops don't want to QSL at all, others don't want paper, others want only direct mail, some only use electronic means, others only use the Bureau, others only LoTW or only eQSL, etc. None of these positions are wrong and it is up to each operator to decide what is best for themselves.

Personally, I found the burden in applying for LoTW or eQSL minimal in return for the benefits.  Additionally, I will QSL using whatever method works for the other station. Paper is great, electronic is just fine too. I will even pay postage (both ways!) for a DX station that wants to send me a card.  All in all, I want to support the hobby and ALL who want to QSL; no matter how they may want to do it.  Ultimately, I view it as a service to those who take the time to have a QSO with me.  I try to make it as painless as possible for the other operator.

Perhaps Don, you could look at the effort to do LoTW as a small contribution to all of the ops that would love to QSL you using that system.  However, ultimately it is your decision to send (or not to send) QSLs however you feel best, and I personally think that no one should give you any grief about it. 

73,

Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net

"Real radio bounces off of the sky"


On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Don Leitch <don@...> wrote:
 

I emailed my eqsl licence for AG  thats enough for them  30 meter digital group has an email record

But lotw wants me to scan the same I emailed  and send it by snail mail as if I am somehow going to falsify via email .

So yes pompos  and time to get the old farts out and catch up the real world we buy and exchange goods via email why not LOTW .

If that makes me childish well so be it. Many others obviously feel the same.

Don zl1atb

 

 

 

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of Michael Tondee
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 6:03 a.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Sorry, I just can't let this one go by....
 It's pompous hunh?? What is your attitude if not the same?  You are being childish. Unfortunately,  you are not the first DX station I have run into will this attitude either. I submit to both eqsl and LOTW but let's be honest, eqsl awards are second class compared to the ARRL and CQ  award programs. I don't think there is much in the hobby that infuriates me more than getting an eqsl confirmation from a needed state or international entity, yet that same station won't confirm via LOTW.  It's petty and ridiculous!
Michael, W4HIJ

On 2/2/2012 9:46 PM, Don Leitch wrote:

 

Hi Don   from another Don  

 For us here in ZL we have to  send by snail mail a copy of our licence to LOTW  before they accept we are legit, they   won’t accept an email one  .

That’s pompous . I wont even bother with them . Thats why I use eqsl.

 

Don zl1atb

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of goldtr8@...
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 3:39 p.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Hi Scott,

 

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

 

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

 

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

 

Cheers

Don





~73

Don

KD8NNU




 

 



locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Don Leitch <don@...>
 

I emailed my eqsl licence for AG  thats enough for them  30 meter digital group has an email record

But lotw wants me to scan the same I emailed  and send it by snail mail as if I am somehow going to falsify via email .

So yes pompos  and time to get the old farts out and catch up the real world we buy and exchange goods via email why not LOTW .

If that makes me childish well so be it. Many others obviously feel the same.

Don zl1atb

 

 

 

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of Michael Tondee
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 6:03 a.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Sorry, I just can't let this one go by....
 It's pompous hunh?? What is your attitude if not the same?  You are being childish. Unfortunately,  you are not the first DX station I have run into will this attitude either. I submit to both eqsl and LOTW but let's be honest, eqsl awards are second class compared to the ARRL and CQ  award programs. I don't think there is much in the hobby that infuriates me more than getting an eqsl confirmation from a needed state or international entity, yet that same station won't confirm via LOTW.  It's petty and ridiculous!
Michael, W4HIJ

On 2/2/2012 9:46 PM, Don Leitch wrote:

 

Hi Don   from another Don  

 For us here in ZL we have to  send by snail mail a copy of our licence to LOTW  before they accept we are legit, they   won’t accept an email one  .

That’s pompous . I wont even bother with them . Thats why I use eqsl.

 

Don zl1atb

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of goldtr8@...
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 3:39 p.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Hi Scott,

 

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

 

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

 

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

 

Cheers

Don





~73

Don

KD8NNU




 

 


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Michael Tondee <mat_62@...>
 

Sorry, I just can't let this one go by....
 It's pompous hunh?? What is your attitude if not the same?  You are being childish. Unfortunately,  you are not the first DX station I have run into will this attitude either. I submit to both eqsl and LOTW but let's be honest, eqsl awards are second class compared to the ARRL and CQ  award programs. I don't think there is much in the hobby that infuriates me more than getting an eqsl confirmation from a needed state or international entity, yet that same station won't confirm via LOTW.  It's petty and ridiculous!
Michael, W4HIJ

On 2/2/2012 9:46 PM, Don Leitch wrote:
 

Hi Don   from another Don  

 For us here in ZL we have to  send by snail mail a copy of our licence to LOTW  before they accept we are legit, they   won’t accept an email one  .

That’s pompous . I wont even bother with them . Thats why I use eqsl.

 

Don zl1atb

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of goldtr8@...
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 3:39 p.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Hi Scott,

 

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

 

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

 

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

 

Cheers

Don




~73

Don

KD8NNU






locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

signal <signalhz@...>
 

My LotW rate is better then eQsl but not by much and it depends on the band and the mode. 50%


73 Eddy N4ABN

On 2/2/2012 9:38 PM, goldtr8@... wrote:
 
Hi Scott,

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

Cheers
Don



~73
Don
KD8NNU


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Scott L. wrote:

   I beg to differ about LoTW. I moved to EPA in 2009, and since September 2009 to today, I have confirmed on LoTW my JT65 WAS, Triple Play WAS, 40M WAS, 20M WAS, CW WAS, Phone WAS, Digital WAS, RTTY WAS, and only need 1 more for 80M WAS, 11 for 15M WAS and 8 more for 10M WAS. So, in less than 2 years I find it difficult to believe you haven't been able to achieve a single WAS on LoTW. It does take time and effort, and I only do ham radio from September to March and I'm done until fall. As N4ABN said, the K3UK LoTW sked page is a valuable source of finding LoTW QSO's.

73 Scott
KN3A

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, < goldtr8@...> wrote:
 
There are many hams who dont use LOTW, if they did I would have WAS in several bands, but right now I have completed zero due to lack of QSL's.

That is the nature of LOTW.

~73
Don
KD8NNU


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, airratt wrote:

    Hi Laurie,

According to JT Alert I have WAS on 20m. When I look at arrl's lotw they say I only have 47 states and need three more. I would like to reconcile both JT Alert and Arrl LotW. Any suggestions other then I need to find three more states to work and upload to LotW?

73
Eddy
N4ABN







-- 
If you do not feel comfortable with firearms, maybe you will be more comfortable as a victim.

https://sites.google.com/site/n4abnradio/


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Ron Settle <settleron@...>
 

With the exception of hamlog.eu, you have my list.   I have to look into that one. 

 

I figure getting my log up on the electronic logbooks has to be helping someone out somehow.  Heck I chase paper also. 

 

Ron

WM9Q

 

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of David Westbrook
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:05 PM
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Ron Settle <settleron@...> wrote:

 

In the mean time I continue to upload to every web based log book out there as often as I can because someone somewhere is looking for QSO confirmation for some reason or another.

 

 

Ron -- I try to do the same ...  What's the list that you upload to?  Curious if there's ones i don't know about, that I could add my current list, which is:
  LOTW  -- regularly via DXKeeper
  eQSL -- regularly via DXKeeper
  ClubLog -- regularly via DXKeeper
  HRDLog.net -- infrequently (manual web upload)
  hamlog.eu -- i know it's out there, but haven't tried it yet. On my to-do list.

  qrz.com -- I don't currently manually review the qsl requests in the qrz logbook. Unfortunately, they don't let non-subscribers  donate their logs by adif upload. (i'd be happy to be ineligible for awards, but contribute matches to their subscription customers.) 

 

 

As to JT65 having a much higher lotw/eqsl rate, my guess would be that it's directly correlated to computer use & savvy ... which obviously is required*** for digital modes, but not for cw/ssb

 

***usually .. there's some nice new rigs out there that can do rtty & psk macros natively w/o PC or keyboard!  (or use cw as input and tx rtty/psk)

 

thanks,

--david

KJ4IZW


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

David Westbrook
 

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Ron Settle <settleron@...> wrote:
 

In the mean time I continue to upload to every web based log book out there as often as I can because someone somewhere is looking for QSO confirmation for some reason or another.



Ron -- I try to do the same ...  What's the list that you upload to?  Curious if there's ones i don't know about, that I could add my current list, which is:
  LOTW  -- regularly via DXKeeper
  eQSL -- regularly via DXKeeper
  ClubLog -- regularly via DXKeeper
  HRDLog.net -- infrequently (manual web upload)
  hamlog.eu -- i know it's out there, but haven't tried it yet. On my to-do list.
  qrz.com -- I don't currently manually review the qsl requests in the qrz logbook. Unfortunately, they don't let non-subscribers  donate their logs by adif upload. (i'd be happy to be ineligible for awards, but contribute matches to their subscription customers.) 


As to JT65 having a much higher lotw/eqsl rate, my guess would be that it's directly correlated to computer use & savvy ... which obviously is required*** for digital modes, but not for cw/ssb

***usually .. there's some nice new rigs out there that can do rtty & psk macros natively w/o PC or keyboard!  (or use cw as input and tx rtty/psk)

thanks,
--david
KJ4IZW


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Ron Settle <settleron@...>
 

I have had decent success with LOTW as well.  I use both eQSL and LOTW and my success rate has been better on LOTW (about 55% success)  but eQSL (about 50% success) is not far behind.  I believe this is due to my contesting activities more than anything.   Would I like to see that higher?  Sure, but not all hams use computer logs (I can’t seem to get my 79 year old dad to do it).  I am confident with time web based logging success will improve.  In the mean time I continue to upload to every web based log book out there as often as I can because someone somewhere is looking for QSO confirmation for some reason or another.

 

Ron

WM9Q

 

 

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of goldtr8@...
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:39 PM
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Hi Scott,

 

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

 

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

 

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

 

Cheers

Don




~73

Don

KD8NNU



On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Scott L. wrote:

 

   I beg to differ about LoTW. I moved to EPA in 2009, and since September 2009 to today, I have confirmed on LoTW my JT65 WAS, Triple Play WAS, 40M WAS, 20M WAS, CW WAS, Phone WAS, Digital WAS, RTTY WAS, and only need 1 more for 80M WAS, 11 for 15M WAS and 8 more for 10M WAS. So, in less than 2 years I find it difficult to believe you haven't been able to achieve a single WAS on LoTW. It does take time and effort, and I only do ham radio from September to March and I'm done until fall. As N4ABN said, the K3UK LoTW sked page is a valuable source of finding LoTW QSO's.

 

73 Scott

KN3A

 

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, < goldtr8@...> wrote:

 

There are many hams who dont use LOTW, if they did I would have WAS in several bands, but right now I have completed zero due to lack of QSL's.

 

That is the nature of LOTW.

 

~73

Don

KD8NNU



On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, airratt wrote:

 

    Hi Laurie,

 

According to JT Alert I have WAS on 20m. When I look at arrl's lotw they say I only have 47 states and need three more. I would like to reconcile both JT Alert and Arrl LotW. Any suggestions other then I need to find three more states to work and upload to LotW?

 

73

Eddy

N4ABN








locked Re: Wrkd states

 

My experience has been that modes like JT65 which are not so much "rag chew" modes tend to get much better LoTW returns. I suspect it's because those modes have more users seeking contact awards. My JT65 QSL returns have been about 50% while others (mainly CW and SSB) have been running around 30 to 35%.

Tom - KØTW

Hi Scott,

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed
back. So the reply rate for me is less than 30%. So I guess you are
contacting a different group than I am :-)

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate.

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

Cheers
Don


~73
Don
KD8NNU

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Scott L. wrote:

I beg to differ about LoTW. I moved to EPA in 2009, and since
September 2009 to today, I have confirmed on LoTW my JT65 WAS, Triple
Play WAS, 40M WAS, 20M WAS, CW WAS, Phone WAS, Digital WAS, RTTY WAS,
and only need 1 more for 80M WAS, 11 for 15M WAS and 8 more for 10M WAS.
So, in less than 2 years I find it difficult to believe you haven't been
able to achieve a single WAS on LoTW. It does take time and effort, and
I only do ham radio from September to March and I'm done until fall. As
N4ABN said, the K3UK LoTW sked page is a valuable source of finding LoTW
QSO's.

73 Scott
KN3A

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, < goldtr8@...
<javascript:parent.wgMail.openComposeWindow('goldtr8@...')> >
wrote:
  <javascript:parent.wgMail.openComposeWindow('goldtr8@...')>
<javascript:parent.wgMail.openComposeWindow('goldtr8@...')>
There are many hams who dont use LOTW, if they did I would have WAS in
several bands, but right now I have completed zero due to lack of QSL's.

That is the nature of LOTW.

~73
Don
KD8NNU

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, airratt wrote:

    Hi Laurie,

According to JT Alert I have WAS on 20m. When I look at arrl's lotw they
say I only have 47 states and need three more. I would like to reconcile
both JT Alert and Arrl LotW. Any suggestions other then I need to find
three more states to work and upload to LotW?

73
Eddy
N4ABN



<http://au.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Don Leitch <don@...>
 

Hi Don   from another Don  

 For us here in ZL we have to  send by snail mail a copy of our licence to LOTW  before they accept we are legit, they   won’t accept an email one  .

That’s pompous . I wont even bother with them . Thats why I use eqsl.

 

Don zl1atb

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of goldtr8@...
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 3:39 p.m.
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

 

 

Hi Scott,

 

I have over 2000 QSO's entered in LOTW and less than 600 have confirmed back.  So the reply rate for me is less than 30%.  So I guess you are contacting a different group than I am :-)

 

I am not complaining just stating the facts as they are for me.

 

EQSL.cc has a much better hit rate. 

 

I have no idea why this is other than it is what it is.

 

Cheers

Don




~73

Don

KD8NNU



On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Scott L. wrote:

 

   I beg to differ about LoTW. I moved to EPA in 2009, and since September 2009 to today, I have confirmed on LoTW my JT65 WAS, Triple Play WAS, 40M WAS, 20M WAS, CW WAS, Phone WAS, Digital WAS, RTTY WAS, and only need 1 more for 80M WAS, 11 for 15M WAS and 8 more for 10M WAS. So, in less than 2 years I find it difficult to believe you haven't been able to achieve a single WAS on LoTW. It does take time and effort, and I only do ham radio from September to March and I'm done until fall. As N4ABN said, the K3UK LoTW sked page is a valuable source of finding LoTW QSO's.

 

73 Scott

KN3A

 

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, < goldtr8@...> wrote:

 

There are many hams who dont use LOTW, if they did I would have WAS in several bands, but right now I have completed zero due to lack of QSL's.

 

That is the nature of LOTW.

 

~73

Don

KD8NNU



On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, airratt wrote:

 

    Hi Laurie,

 

According to JT Alert I have WAS on 20m. When I look at arrl's lotw they say I only have 47 states and need three more. I would like to reconcile both JT Alert and Arrl LotW. Any suggestions other then I need to find three more states to work and upload to LotW?

 

73

Eddy

N4ABN








locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Goldtr8 &#92;(KD8NNU&#92;)
 


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Re: Version 1.5.9 and Virus

Ron Settle <settleron@...>
 

OK thanks,

 

Norton Antivirus is giving a false positive.

 

Ron

 

From: Ham-Apps@... [mailto:Ham-Apps@...] On Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:01 PM
To: Ham-Apps@...
Subject: Re: [Ham-Apps] Re: Version 1.5.9 and Virus

 

 

JT-Alert_Sounds_1.0.2_Setup.exe is virus free.

Results can be viewed here... http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/64d73e69eba9875e22ef283f07f9970d4ac4de7b




de Laurie, VK3AMA


On 03-February-2012 08:52, wm9q_il wrote:

JT alert sounds is now flagging as having a virus.  Tried to download it today.
 
Ron
WM9Q
 
--- In Ham-Apps@..., Ron Walters <rsw.walters@...> wrote:
 
The good news is effective Friday 1-20-12 the Avast update corrected
the problem.  Really missed JT65-Alert for two days.
 
73 de
Ron W4LDE
 
On 1/18/12, Damien FORESTIER  wrote:
Yes I have the same issue using Avast...
 
The only way for the moment is to desactivate temporary Avast's
permanent checking....
 
I hope they will erase from the Rootkit list.
 
73 - Damien F5RRS
 
 
2012/1/18 w4lde :
Until today's update from Avast I ran alert ver 1.5.9 without any
problems, however, now the anti-virus program states that JT65-Alaert EXE
contains a virus called WIN32:Rootkit-Gen which is real and somewhat
dangerous.
 
I believe that it is a false positive and have sent the file to Avast for
their feedback, however, unfortunately I can not run 1.5.9 and had to
revert back to 1.5.6
 
Anyone else experience a virus alert from either Avast or another
anti-virus program?
 
Love the program and now feel lost without 1.5.9 running hi hi.
 
73 de
Ron W4LDE
 
 
 


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Re: Version 1.5.9 and Virus

Laurie, VK3AMA <groups03@...>
 

JT-Alert_Sounds_1.0.2_Setup.exe is virus free.

Results can be viewed here... http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/64d73e69eba9875e22ef283f07f9970d4ac4de7b




de Laurie, VK3AMA


On 03-February-2012 08:52, wm9q_il wrote:
JT alert sounds is now flagging as having a virus.  Tried to download it today.

Ron
WM9Q

--- In Ham-Apps@..., Ron Walters  wrote:
The good news is effective Friday 1-20-12 the Avast update corrected
the problem.  Really missed JT65-Alert for two days.

73 de
Ron W4LDE

On 1/18/12, Damien FORESTIER  wrote:
Yes I have the same issue using Avast...

The only way for the moment is to desactivate temporary Avast's
permanent checking....

I hope they will erase from the Rootkit list.

73 - Damien F5RRS


2012/1/18 w4lde :
Until today's update from Avast I ran alert ver 1.5.9 without any
problems, however, now the anti-virus program states that JT65-Alaert EXE
contains a virus called WIN32:Rootkit-Gen which is real and somewhat
dangerous.

I believe that it is a false positive and have sent the file to Avast for
their feedback, however, unfortunately I can not run 1.5.9 and had to
revert back to 1.5.6

Anyone else experience a virus alert from either Avast or another
anti-virus program?

Love the program and now feel lost without 1.5.9 running hi hi.

73 de
Ron W4LDE




locked Re: Version 1.5.9 and Virus

wm9q_il <settleron@...>
 

JT alert sounds is now flagging as having a virus. Tried to download it today.

Ron
WM9Q

--- In Ham-Apps@yahoogroups.com.au, Ron Walters <rsw.walters@...> wrote:

The good news is effective Friday 1-20-12 the Avast update corrected
the problem. Really missed JT65-Alert for two days.

73 de
Ron W4LDE

On 1/18/12, Damien FORESTIER <f5rrs@...> wrote:
Yes I have the same issue using Avast...

The only way for the moment is to desactivate temporary Avast's
permanent checking....

I hope they will erase from the Rootkit list.

73 - Damien F5RRS


2012/1/18 w4lde <rsw.walters@...>:
Until today's update from Avast I ran alert ver 1.5.9 without any
problems, however, now the anti-virus program states that JT65-Alaert EXE
contains a virus called WIN32:Rootkit-Gen which is real and somewhat
dangerous.

I believe that it is a false positive and have sent the file to Avast for
their feedback, however, unfortunately I can not run 1.5.9 and had to
revert back to 1.5.6

Anyone else experience a virus alert from either Avast or another
anti-virus program?

Love the program and now feel lost without 1.5.9 running hi hi.

73 de
Ron W4LDE






------------------------------------

Yahoo!7 Groups Links



locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Bob KD7YZ <kd7yz.bob@...>
 

On 2/1/2012 9:55 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:


Bob,

Regarding HamSpots. On most pages (Bands, Clubs, Modes) there is a link
to post a spot on the upper-right of the Cluster Spot display. eq..
ahh .. I forgot that one. I am sending My-View.. what I looked at for
hours at a time. This one I had to refresh and I didn't see a
hot-spot-send on it and forgot the others .. plus, one tends to get
myopic when one is glued to the screen for a few days straight.

thanks for your work.


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Laurie, VK3AMA <groups03@...>
 

Bob,

Regarding HamSpots. On most pages (Bands, Clubs, Modes) there is a link to post a spot on the upper-right of the Cluster Spot display. eq..


I will need to check the Page Refresh code of the Callsign History page. I seem to recall that I may have disabled the auto-refresh on that page several months ago, but I am unsure if I did, and if so, for what reason, possibly a database issue.

de Laurie, VK3AMA


On 02-February-2012 13:40, Bob KD7YZ wrote:
On 2/1/2012 8:15 PM, signal wrote:
.....   Is a good one and so is HamSpots.
Hamspots: now that you brought that one up ... I was looking for a place
on there to actually 'Send' a Spot the last few days as I worked that
Hk0NA group throughout all the bands. Never saw one and didn't find a
Help page to tell me.

Also, I noticed I had to continually update/refresh the filtered-page I
made for their call-sign. Is that normal or did I also miss how to do that?

Still, that's the only one I use and it's totally useful.

--
bob kd7yz


------------------------------------

Yahoo!7 Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/Ham-Apps/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/Ham-Apps/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Ham-Apps-digest@... 
    Ham-Apps-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Ham-Apps-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo!7 Groups is subject to:
    http://au.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Bob KD7YZ <kd7yz.bob@...>
 

On 2/1/2012 8:15 PM, signal wrote:
..... Is a good one and so is HamSpots.
Hamspots: now that you brought that one up ... I was looking for a place
on there to actually 'Send' a Spot the last few days as I worked that
Hk0NA group throughout all the bands. Never saw one and didn't find a
Help page to tell me.

Also, I noticed I had to continually update/refresh the filtered-page I
made for their call-sign. Is that normal or did I also miss how to do that?

Still, that's the only one I use and it's totally useful.

--
bob kd7yz


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

signal <signalhz@...>
 

Ok I will try them and see what they say.

Thanks for the great program and replies.

73 Eddy N4ABN


On 2/1/2012 8:54 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
 

Hi Eddy,

That output corresponds to what JT-Alert is reporting, 50 States confirmed, 0 States needed.
It is unclear to me why the LoTW site is reporting 3 needed States on 20M, beyond my control. Good Luck.

de Laurie, VK3AMA

On 02-February-2012 12:44, signal wrote:

Here's with filter.

N4ABN Worked All US States Report 01-Feb-2012
Log Filter: Band = 20M

States worked or confirmed: 50
States confirmed:           50

   State        Callsign         Date & Time    Band    Mode    Card    LotW    eQSL
      AK           KL7YK   05-Feb-2010 18:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AL            KK4A   20-Dec-2009 17:17     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AR           AE5PW   20-Dec-2009 16:33     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AZ            WT9S   17-May-2010 02:19     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CA            K6FW   26-Dec-2009 18:26     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CO           N0SMX   08-Feb-2010 21:10     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CT            K1PL   05-Apr-2011 17:10     20M    JT65               Y       R
      DE          KB3IWV   08-Mar-2011 02:20     20M    JT65               Y       R
      FL           W4CQZ   26-Dec-2009 22:49     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      GA           W4LDE   02-Feb-2010 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      HI      KC2QII/KH6   24-Mar-2010 05:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IA          KC0BMF   20-Jul-2010 07:14     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ID           W4NML   20-Jan-2010 19:52     20M    JT65               Y       R
      IL           N9MIW   04-Jul-2010 15:20     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IN            AE9K   06-Jan-2010 22:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KS            N0NM   26-Jan-2012 14:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KY           KD7YZ   15-Dec-2009 17:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      LA           AD5VC   19-Apr-2010 01:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MA          WB2HTO   21-Dec-2009 18:36     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MD           K3DCW   30-Apr-2010 18:18     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      ME           W1LIC   11-Feb-2011 21:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MI           N8ABY   14-Dec-2009 17:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MN           W0RSB   10-Mar-2011 14:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MO           W7THY   01-Jan-2010 17:42     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MS            W8DM   23-Mar-2010 23:00     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MT           W7GET   08-Jan-2010 16:55     20M    JT65               Y       R
      NC            NE4W   13-Jan-2010 20:34     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ND          KD4POJ   31-Jan-2012 21:56     20M      CW               Y       R
      NE            NI0B   18-Feb-2010 01:08     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NH            KJ1J   25-Jun-2010 04:15     20M    JT65       R       Y       Y
      NJ            WJ2T   07-Apr-2011 02:06     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NM          KE5ZGI   15-Dec-2009 17:32     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NV           W7LAB   24-Apr-2010 17:12     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NY          KB2AMY   20-Jan-2010 20:13     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OH            N8VZ   06-Jan-2010 18:45     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OK          KD5JGA   26-Dec-2009 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OR            N7MQ   25-Jan-2010 22:19     20M   PSK31               Y       Y
      PA          KB3TJT   28-Feb-2010 21:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      RI           KE1AF   07-Apr-2010 22:54     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SC           N4BAF   13-Jun-2010 03:39     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SD            K7RE   13-May-2011 16:03     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TN            NS2R   14-May-2010 01:43     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TX            K5WW   16-Feb-2010 00:11     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      UT          WA7YAZ   20-May-2010 04:27     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      VA            W4NA   18-Dec-2009 16:26     20M    JT65               Y       N
      VT            K1KS   22-Jul-2010 12:30     20M    JT65               Y       R
      WA           W7RDP   26-Jun-2006 04:11     20M   PSK31       Y missing       
      WI            K1RS   21-Dec-2009 19:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WV          KD8EZS   12-Apr-2011 22:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WY           K7EMR   28-Jan-2012 22:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y


Not sure why it says missing for the state of Washington. Missing eqsl? Who cares? lol.

Eddy N4ABN

On 2/1/2012 8:38 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
 

Hi Eddy,

I use DXKeeper exclusively for my logging and am certain that JT-Alert correctly determines needed States when scanning the log. During JT-ALert testing, I cross check the results with my LoTW records and get a 100% match.

To get a WAS report from DXKeeper by mode (or band), you need to filter your DXKeeper log for the mode (or band) before running the DXKeeper WAS report.

de Laurie, VK3AMA



-- 
If you do not feel comfortable with firearms, maybe you will be more comfortable as a victim.

https://sites.google.com/site/n4abnradio/


locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

Laurie, VK3AMA <groups03@...>
 

Hi Eddy,

That output corresponds to what JT-Alert is reporting, 50 States confirmed, 0 States needed.
It is unclear to me why the LoTW site is reporting 3 needed States on 20M, beyond my control. Good Luck.

de Laurie, VK3AMA

On 02-February-2012 12:44, signal wrote:
Here's with filter.

N4ABN Worked All US States Report 01-Feb-2012
Log Filter: Band = 20M

States worked or confirmed: 50
States confirmed:           50

   State        Callsign         Date & Time    Band    Mode    Card    LotW    eQSL
      AK           KL7YK   05-Feb-2010 18:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AL            KK4A   20-Dec-2009 17:17     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AR           AE5PW   20-Dec-2009 16:33     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AZ            WT9S   17-May-2010 02:19     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CA            K6FW   26-Dec-2009 18:26     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CO           N0SMX   08-Feb-2010 21:10     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CT            K1PL   05-Apr-2011 17:10     20M    JT65               Y       R
      DE          KB3IWV   08-Mar-2011 02:20     20M    JT65               Y       R
      FL           W4CQZ   26-Dec-2009 22:49     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      GA           W4LDE   02-Feb-2010 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      HI      KC2QII/KH6   24-Mar-2010 05:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IA          KC0BMF   20-Jul-2010 07:14     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ID           W4NML   20-Jan-2010 19:52     20M    JT65               Y       R
      IL           N9MIW   04-Jul-2010 15:20     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IN            AE9K   06-Jan-2010 22:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KS            N0NM   26-Jan-2012 14:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KY           KD7YZ   15-Dec-2009 17:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      LA           AD5VC   19-Apr-2010 01:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MA          WB2HTO   21-Dec-2009 18:36     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MD           K3DCW   30-Apr-2010 18:18     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      ME           W1LIC   11-Feb-2011 21:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MI           N8ABY   14-Dec-2009 17:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MN           W0RSB   10-Mar-2011 14:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MO           W7THY   01-Jan-2010 17:42     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MS            W8DM   23-Mar-2010 23:00     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MT           W7GET   08-Jan-2010 16:55     20M    JT65               Y       R
      NC            NE4W   13-Jan-2010 20:34     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ND          KD4POJ   31-Jan-2012 21:56     20M      CW               Y       R
      NE            NI0B   18-Feb-2010 01:08     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NH            KJ1J   25-Jun-2010 04:15     20M    JT65       R       Y       Y
      NJ            WJ2T   07-Apr-2011 02:06     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NM          KE5ZGI   15-Dec-2009 17:32     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NV           W7LAB   24-Apr-2010 17:12     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NY          KB2AMY   20-Jan-2010 20:13     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OH            N8VZ   06-Jan-2010 18:45     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OK          KD5JGA   26-Dec-2009 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OR            N7MQ   25-Jan-2010 22:19     20M   PSK31               Y       Y
      PA          KB3TJT   28-Feb-2010 21:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      RI           KE1AF   07-Apr-2010 22:54     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SC           N4BAF   13-Jun-2010 03:39     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SD            K7RE   13-May-2011 16:03     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TN            NS2R   14-May-2010 01:43     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TX            K5WW   16-Feb-2010 00:11     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      UT          WA7YAZ   20-May-2010 04:27     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      VA            W4NA   18-Dec-2009 16:26     20M    JT65               Y       N
      VT            K1KS   22-Jul-2010 12:30     20M    JT65               Y       R
      WA           W7RDP   26-Jun-2006 04:11     20M   PSK31       Y missing       
      WI            K1RS   21-Dec-2009 19:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WV          KD8EZS   12-Apr-2011 22:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WY           K7EMR   28-Jan-2012 22:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y


Not sure why it says missing for the state of Washington. Missing eqsl? Who cares? lol.

Eddy N4ABN

On 2/1/2012 8:38 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
 

Hi Eddy,

I use DXKeeper exclusively for my logging and am certain that JT-Alert correctly determines needed States when scanning the log. During JT-ALert testing, I cross check the results with my LoTW records and get a 100% match.

To get a WAS report from DXKeeper by mode (or band), you need to filter your DXKeeper log for the mode (or band) before running the DXKeeper WAS report.

de Laurie, VK3AMA



locked Re: [Ham-Apps] Wrkd states

signal <signalhz@...>
 

Here's with filter.

N4ABN Worked All US States Report 01-Feb-2012
Log Filter: Band = 20M

States worked or confirmed: 50
States confirmed:           50

   State        Callsign         Date & Time    Band    Mode    Card    LotW    eQSL
      AK           KL7YK   05-Feb-2010 18:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AL            KK4A   20-Dec-2009 17:17     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AR           AE5PW   20-Dec-2009 16:33     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      AZ            WT9S   17-May-2010 02:19     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CA            K6FW   26-Dec-2009 18:26     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CO           N0SMX   08-Feb-2010 21:10     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      CT            K1PL   05-Apr-2011 17:10     20M    JT65               Y       R
      DE          KB3IWV   08-Mar-2011 02:20     20M    JT65               Y       R
      FL           W4CQZ   26-Dec-2009 22:49     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      GA           W4LDE   02-Feb-2010 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      HI      KC2QII/KH6   24-Mar-2010 05:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IA          KC0BMF   20-Jul-2010 07:14     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ID           W4NML   20-Jan-2010 19:52     20M    JT65               Y       R
      IL           N9MIW   04-Jul-2010 15:20     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      IN            AE9K   06-Jan-2010 22:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KS            N0NM   26-Jan-2012 14:48     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      KY           KD7YZ   15-Dec-2009 17:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      LA           AD5VC   19-Apr-2010 01:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MA          WB2HTO   21-Dec-2009 18:36     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MD           K3DCW   30-Apr-2010 18:18     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      ME           W1LIC   11-Feb-2011 21:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MI           N8ABY   14-Dec-2009 17:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MN           W0RSB   10-Mar-2011 14:05     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MO           W7THY   01-Jan-2010 17:42     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MS            W8DM   23-Mar-2010 23:00     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      MT           W7GET   08-Jan-2010 16:55     20M    JT65               Y       R
      NC            NE4W   13-Jan-2010 20:34     20M    JT65               Y       R
      ND          KD4POJ   31-Jan-2012 21:56     20M      CW               Y       R
      NE            NI0B   18-Feb-2010 01:08     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NH            KJ1J   25-Jun-2010 04:15     20M    JT65       R       Y       Y
      NJ            WJ2T   07-Apr-2011 02:06     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NM          KE5ZGI   15-Dec-2009 17:32     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NV           W7LAB   24-Apr-2010 17:12     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      NY          KB2AMY   20-Jan-2010 20:13     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OH            N8VZ   06-Jan-2010 18:45     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OK          KD5JGA   26-Dec-2009 17:57     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      OR            N7MQ   25-Jan-2010 22:19     20M   PSK31               Y       Y
      PA          KB3TJT   28-Feb-2010 21:01     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      RI           KE1AF   07-Apr-2010 22:54     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SC           N4BAF   13-Jun-2010 03:39     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      SD            K7RE   13-May-2011 16:03     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TN            NS2R   14-May-2010 01:43     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      TX            K5WW   16-Feb-2010 00:11     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      UT          WA7YAZ   20-May-2010 04:27     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      VA            W4NA   18-Dec-2009 16:26     20M    JT65               Y       N
      VT            K1KS   22-Jul-2010 12:30     20M    JT65               Y       R
      WA           W7RDP   26-Jun-2006 04:11     20M   PSK31       Y missing       
      WI            K1RS   21-Dec-2009 19:41     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WV          KD8EZS   12-Apr-2011 22:46     20M    JT65               Y       Y
      WY           K7EMR   28-Jan-2012 22:24     20M    JT65               Y       Y


Not sure why it says missing for the state of Washington. Missing eqsl? Who cares? lol.

Eddy N4ABN

On 2/1/2012 8:38 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
 

Hi Eddy,

I use DXKeeper exclusively for my logging and am certain that JT-Alert correctly determines needed States when scanning the log. During JT-ALert testing, I cross check the results with my LoTW records and get a 100% match.

To get a WAS report from DXKeeper by mode (or band), you need to filter your DXKeeper log for the mode (or band) before running the DXKeeper WAS report.

de Laurie, VK3AMA