Date   

locked Re: Band Activity Window

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 4/09/2017 12:44 AM, Jim Smith G0OFE wrote:

hello all,

Seems the Band Activity window can only show up to 3 digit numbers... unless i have an option wrongly set....

See attached pic.

73/Jim

Jim,

A fix is already coded for the next JTAlert release.

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: Sorting New stations calling CQ FT8

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 4/09/2017 1:14 AM, Peter Vouvounas wrote:
Like all of you I am enjoying JTAlert FT8 

Is there a way to sort the call listings so new stations calling CQ show up in the list first?

TIA

73

PeterV WB3FSR

Peter,

Sorry, not possible. JTAlert currently sorts the received decodes by Callsign and then removes any harmonics of a Callsign, leaving the fundamental (highest db) decode, then sorts the list again by frequency. The Callsigns are then displayed left to right follow the DF of the Callsigns lowest to highest. Where a Callsign is placed within the the display gives a visual queue as to where they appear in the WSJT-X waterfall.

Adding an additional sort to display CQs first would add additional processing time before Callsigns are displayed. Honestly, I can see any advantage to displaying CQs at the start of the list of Callsigns. What would this achieve?

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: ACLog WSJT-x, JTAlert Field names an ADIF

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 4/09/2017 1:10 AM, Peter Vouvounas wrote:
Hi Folks,

Somewhere I remember reading that certain fields in ACLog should be renamed to properly support adif when using the above applications. However I have not been able to locate the info.

Any pointers to find this?

Thankss

73 PeterV WB3FSR

Peter,

Naming the "Other" fields to match the adif tag of the data stored in an "Other" field allows for any adif export of the ACLog log to use the correct adif tag. This is done within ACLog. For example, if you have JTAlert logging the QSLMSG (which ACLog doesn't support natively) to an "Other" field, you should set the title for that field in ACLog to "QSLMSG". The ACLog help likely explains this better than I.

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: Showing harmonics of the JT65 signals in hamspots.net

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 3/09/2017 8:33 PM, Игорь Ч via Groups.Io wrote:
Hello Laurie,

Is it worth to show reported harmonics of JT65 signals in the hamspots.net/jt65 Web interface? I think it would let operators to check almost in real time if they transmitting dirty signals, at least this type of spurious emissions.

As JTDX decodes jt65 harmonics I can try to add it to UDP messages being sent to UDP server as new type of message.

73 Igor UA3DJY
Igor,

Sorry, I can't see any benefit in displaying harmonic decodes. They are non-workable. JTAlert deliberately removes any harmonic decodes of the fundamental signal and only alerts and send spots of the fundamental.

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: little ^

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 3/09/2017 8:48 PM, Randy True wrote:
I figured out what the little square to the right of the last alert call box is; "enable halt after current transmission"
What is the up arrow to the left of the 1st alert box used for?

Randy W4RTT

Randy,

That symbol is a mouse-hover hotspot to display the Callsign History for your current QSO partner (DX Call in WSJT-X). The symbol was provided for those who don't have the Log Fields displayed in JTAlert. When the Log Fields are shown, hovering your mouse over your QSO partner Callsign will show their Callsign Hostory.

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: Dual transmit

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 4/09/2017 4:16 AM, Michael Black via Groups.Io wrote:
I'm doing some experiments  with transmitting JT65 and JT9 CQ's simulaneously with my ANAN 100.

On hamspots.net I don't see any simultaneous decodes.  Is there a filter removing "duplicate" spot reports and not checking the mode?  I would think somebody should be running JT65+JT9 and see both transmissions.

de Mike W9MDB

Mike,

The only dupes removed are for the same callsign, mode, band and utc time (to the minute). You should be seeing both your jt65 and jt9 spots. Are you not seeing them when you view the /myspots/ page on HamSpots?

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked Re: DXCC entity not matching call sign

JTAlert Support (VK3AMA)
 

On 4/09/2017 7:29 AM, Kevin Utzy wrote:
I've notice this behavior in my situation and I was wondering if anybody else noticed this.  I am using the hamapps callsign database.  After a bit, I see callsigns that show up properly with their entity name, then a little while later is shows up with a DX entity name that is wrong.  A couple of examples.  N7RO shows F.R. Germany.  I had one instance of two XE callsigns showing up at the same time as N. Ireland.  In both cases a proper call sign with those entities was shown prior.  It isn't a huge deal since I know better.  I was curious if anybody else had seen that?

73,
Kevin
KX4KU

Kevin,

Yours is the first report of this behaviour. What version of JTAlert are you running?

When you next observe this, use the "? -> Contact Support" menu, on the JTAlert title-bar, to send me your Configuration and Session files for analysis. Include a note

of the UTC time, Callsign and the wrong dxcc name.

de Laurie VK3AMA
   


locked DXCC entity not matching call sign

Kevin Utzy
 

I've notice this behavior in my situation and I was wondering if anybody else noticed this.  I am using the hamapps callsign database.  After a bit, I see callsigns that show up properly with their entity name, then a little while later is shows up with a DX entity name that is wrong.  A couple of examples.  N7RO shows F.R. Germany.  I had one instance of two XE callsigns showing up at the same time as N. Ireland.  In both cases a proper call sign with those entities was shown prior.  It isn't a huge deal since I know better.  I was curious if anybody else had seen that?

73,
Kevin
KX4KU


locked Re: ACLog WSJT-x, JTAlert Field names an ADIF

Dave Garber
 

why,   jtalert and jdtdx/wstx work fine with mine.   what issue are you seeing

Dave Garber
VE3WEJ / VE3IE

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Peter Vouvounas <wb3fsr@...> wrote:

Hi Folks,

Somewhere I remember reading that certain fields in ACLog should be renamed to properly support adif when using the above applications. However I have not been able to locate the info.

Any pointers to find this?

Thankss

73 PeterV WB3FSR

 



locked Sorting New stations calling CQ FT8

Peter Vouvounas
 

Like all of you I am enjoying JTAlert FT8 

Is there a way to sort the call listings so new stations calling CQ show up in the list first?

TIA

73

PeterV WB3FSR


locked ACLog WSJT-x, JTAlert Field names an ADIF

Peter Vouvounas
 

Hi Folks,

Somewhere I remember reading that certain fields in ACLog should be renamed to properly support adif when using the above applications. However I have not been able to locate the info.

Any pointers to find this?

Thankss

73 PeterV WB3FSR

 


locked Re: Dual transmit

Bill Barrett
 

Mike-
Have seen stations send 73 and CQ simultaneously. 
Bill
W2PKY

Sent from my iPad Mini

On Sep 3, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Michael Black via Groups.Io <mdblack98@...> wrote:

I'm doing some experiments  with transmitting JT65 and JT9 CQ's simulaneously with my ANAN 100.

On hamspots.net I don't see any simultaneous decodes.  Is there a filter removing "duplicate" spot reports and not checking the mode?  I would think somebody should be running JT65+JT9 and see both transmissions.

de Mike W9MDB


locked Dual transmit

Michael Black
 

I'm doing some experiments  with transmitting JT65 and JT9 CQ's simulaneously with my ANAN 100.

On hamspots.net I don't see any simultaneous decodes.  Is there a filter removing "duplicate" spot reports and not checking the mode?  I would think somebody should be running JT65+JT9 and see both transmissions.

de Mike W9MDB


locked Re: little ^

Bob Junke
 

If you hover it you should see something like this :
It shows previous QSOs with a specific op and the bands where QSOs occurred.



Bob
W7REJ
bob@...
www.w7rej.net
PCOEM Comm / RST / GVARC

On 9/3/2017 3:48 AM, Randy True wrote:
I figured out what the little square to the right of the last alert call box is; "enable halt after current transmission"
What is the up arrow to the left of the 1st alert box used for?

Randy W4RTT


locked Re: Showing harmonics of the JT65 signals in hamspots.net

Jim - N4ST
 

I would think it would cause confusion with harmonics that are created on the receiving end.
There are plenty of operators that have the audio level set too high on the receive end also.
The only way I know to be sure, is if you are receiving a stronger signal that does not have harmonics at the same time you see the "dirty" signal.

_________
73,
Jim - N4ST

From: Support@HamApps.groups.io [mailto:Support@HamApps.groups.io] On Behalf Of ????? ? via Groups.Io
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 06:33
To: Support@HamApps.groups.io
Subject: [HamApps] Showing harmonics of the JT65 signals in hamspots.net

Hello Laurie,

Is it worth to show reported harmonics of JT65 signals in the hamspots.net/jt65 Web interface? I think it would let operators to check almost in real time if they transmitting dirty signals, at least this type of spurious emissions.

As JTDX decodes jt65 harmonics I can try to add it to UDP messages being sent to UDP server as new type of message.

73 Igor UA3DJY


locked Re: Band Activity Window

Michael Black
 

There's a fix in the works for htat.

Meanwhile in WIndows/Band Activity Display turn on the continent filter for more relevant numbers.
I think that's a little-known option.

de Mike W9MD




From: Jim Smith G0OFE <sdr-radio@...>
To: Support@HamApps.groups.io
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 9:45 AM
Subject: [HamApps] Band Activity Window

hello all,
Seems the Band Activity window can only show up to 3 digit numbers... unless i have an option wrongly set....
See attached pic.
73/Jim

--
================================
Jim, Bournemouth, Dorset. IO90BR.
Elad FDM-S2, Perseus/FM+, SDRPlay and Funcube Dongle SDR Recievers
8-element OP-DES for Band 2, 12-ele ZL Special for 2m, plus wideband vertical. Wellbrook 1530 Loop for LF



Virus-free. www.avast.com



locked Band Activity Window

Jim Smith G0OFE
 

hello all,

Seems the Band Activity window can only show up to 3 digit numbers... unless i have an option wrongly set....

See attached pic.

73/Jim


--
================================
Jim, Bournemouth, Dorset. IO90BR.
Elad FDM-S2, Perseus/FM+, SDRPlay and Funcube Dongle SDR Recievers
8-element OP-DES for Band 2, 12-ele ZL Special for 2m, plus wideband vertical. Wellbrook 1530 Loop for LF



Virus-free. www.avast.com


locked Re: E-mail threading etiquette - was: Re: [HamApps] jtdx.exe

Dave (NK7Z)
 

Thanks, I always suspected this, but never looked! THANKS!

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 09/03/2017 06:59 AM, g4wjs wrote:
Hi Dave,
yes there are hidden link field in the headers, for example here is the one from your message below:
Those headers uniquely identify the message and the ones it is linked to in the thread tree.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 03/09/2017 14:52, Dave Cole wrote:
While I don't do this, I have wondered for a few years why this is true? Is there a header holding the Subject, that is not changed if one changes the subject using a email client?

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 09/03/2017 06:09 AM, g4wjs wrote:
Replying to messages with unrelated text and changing the subject is an appalling breach of netiquette and a PITA to those of us who monitor many high volume lists offering support.
--
73
Bill
G4WJS.


locked Re: E-mail threading etiquette - was: Re: [HamApps] jtdx.exe

g4wjs
 

Hi Dave,

yes there are hidden link field in the headers, for example here is the one from your message below:


Those headers uniquely identify the message and the ones it is linked to in the thread tree.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 03/09/2017 14:52, Dave Cole wrote:
While I don't do this, I have wondered for a few years why this is true?  Is there a header holding the Subject, that is not changed if one changes the subject using a email client?

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 09/03/2017 06:09 AM, g4wjs wrote:
Replying to messages with unrelated text and changing the subject is an appalling breach of netiquette and a PITA to those of us who monitor many high volume lists offering support.



--
73
Bill
G4WJS.


locked Re: E-mail threading etiquette - was: Re: [HamApps] jtdx.exe

Michael Black
 

Check the email source (like on this thread) and you should see
X-Orig-Message-Id: 22eac829-75a3-5931-82f4-d686269757ab@...
de Mike W9MDB



From: Dave Cole <dave@...>
To: Support@HamApps.groups.io
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: E-mail threading etiquette - was: Re: [HamApps] jtdx.exe

While I don't do this, I have wondered for a few years why this is true?
  Is there a header holding the Subject, that is not changed if one
changes the subject using a email client?

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 09/03/2017 06:09 AM, g4wjs wrote:
> Replying to messages with unrelated text and changing the subject is an
> appalling breach of netiquette and a PITA to those of us who monitor
> many high volume lists offering support.